In another matter, the rail authority recently announced it had secured a $24-million grant from the U.S. The California bullet train project can continue to draw on a bond approved by voters in 2008 after a Superior Court judge on Thursday rejected a civil suit that sought to block the use of those funds. When he asked why, he said he was bluntly told by others: “politics.” Flashman said he doubted it would make sense to appeal the decision to the California Supreme Court, but it would depend on his clients.Ĭalifornia Bullet train survives legal challenge as judge tosses lawsuit over bond funds Stuart Flashman, an attorney representing the plaintiffs, said he was deeply disappointed by the decision, but acknowledged that he had been warned long ago that he could lose the legal battle. The lengthy decision contains a broad examination of past decisions, going back to the Erie Canal. Sueyoshi, who ruled the legislation did not change the central purpose of the project.Īs a practical matter, many political experts doubted that any court would block what is now a $100-billion project based on complex legal arguments. The ruling upholds a November 2018 decision by Sacramento County Superior Court Judge Richard K. The California bullet train has won a court victory in a key lawsuit that sought to stop the $64-billion project because it allegedly violated restrictions voters imposed in 2008.
California Court rejects key lawsuit against California high-speed rail system
0 kommentar(er)
